Paul McCartney glued together

from the oxycodone zone

Persona non grata

He is better than us, that is why I don't like him. He's got some sort of Title. He was a Beatle. He isn't dead from booze or dope. Why does he feel inclined to insult the US on a visit to the White House?

I don't have anything nice to say about England. I've been there and didn't like it. I kept my mouth shut about it. Even now, I could say awful things about the English. But I won't. Unlike Paul, I'm a gentleman. Besides, I know you are already thinking rude thoughts about the English.
---
Doesn't it appear from the photograph that Paul looks like his face has been glued up? Stuck in a lovable mop-top Beatle caricature. How old is he, anyhow? His Wikipedia entry says he is just about to turn 68.

It also says: "Sir James Paul McCartney, MBE (born 18 June 1942) is an English singer-songwriter, composer, multi-instrumentalist, entrepreneur, record and film producer, poet, painter, and animal rights and peace activist. Formerly of The Beatles and Wings, according to Guinness World Records, McCartney is the most successful songwriter in the history of popular music." He is better than us.

Nothing Honorable About Ted Rall

I'm surprised that Ted Rall can leave his house without getting his ass kicked.

Fred Thompson is no Gandhi

What Would Gandhi Do?

I still think the GOP screwed themselves when they failed to take Fred Thompson seriously. The old cat never ceases to amaze me. A Google Alert popped these two stories from the Indian Blogosphere into my in-box this morning: Gandhian self-destruction from Indian Raksa - Defending Secular India, and Gandhi’s Way Isn’t the American Way: Collective suicide is no foreign policy from Islamic Terrorism in India.

Both of these posts are based on this March 15, 2007 National Review Online transcript of a Fred Thompson radio spot. Listen to Fred right here. (mp3 file) Doesn't he sound presidential?

Here is a cut and paste of Fred's still relevant talk:

At what point is it okay to fight dictators like Saddam or the al Qaeda terrorists who want to take his place?

It turns out that the answer, according to Gandhi, is NEVER. During World War II, Gandhi penned an open letter to the British people, urging them to surrender to the Nazis. Later, when the extent of the holocaust was known, he criticized Jews who had tried to escape or fight for their lives as they did in Warsaw and Treblinka. “The Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher’s knife,” he said. “They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.” “Collective suicide,” he told his biographer, “would have been heroism.”

The so-called peace movement certainly has the right to make Gandhi’s way their way, but their efforts to make collective suicide American foreign policy just won’t cut it in this country. When Americans think of heroism, we think of the young American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, risking their lives to prevent another Adolph Hitler or Saddam Hussein.

Gandhi probably wouldn't approve, but I can live with that.

I could live with that myself, rather than than die trying to appease or reason with the murderous Mohammedan fanatics. Peaceniks, who needs 'em? I'll leave it up to you to ascertain the answer to What would Obama do? We shall see if he's still for surrender in the middle east after he visits the victory zone. Perhaps another giant BO flip-flop is in the works.
---
Google Alerts - like having your own clipping service.

Unpatriotic Unions

Look for the Union Label. Then buy something else.
---
It is officially OK to doubt their patriotism out loud.