Showing posts with label ain't democracy grand?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ain't democracy grand?. Show all posts

November 05, 2008

I hate to be a sore loser


Ain't Democracy Grand?
Nobody likes a sore loser, but that won't stop me. When the disappointment passes, the path ahead will remain clear, the objective unchanged: to live free in an unfree world.
---
More loser self-analysis:
David Kahane: We got this the old-fashioned way: we earned it. The other side took the fight to us, and we never took the fight to the other side, except coyly and obliquely. That's not a mistake we should make the next time. "Honorable campaigns" are for losers. Next time, call 'em as they really are, not as you wish to see 'em.
Mark Steyn: We need to rediscover a coherent conservatism and find someone who can pitch it to sufficient numbers of people. We didn't have either in this campaign.
Henry Luis Gomez: Hopefully our party has gotten the bipartisan bug out of its system and will begin to think about WINNING rather than compromising for a change. [Sometimes you have to step in shit to know that it is shit.]
---
At least America won't have to put up with being called a racist nation anymore.
---
Addendum: A frequent commenter from a third-world country developing nation Canada suggests that I lay some blame for John McCain's defeat yesterday. Always eager to please regular Plains Feeder readers, I hereby blame the Republican Party leadership. They wanted to re-brand the party to attract the less conservative voter. Their effort to water down Republican values went over like New Coke. Fewer Republicans voted for McCain this year than voted for George Bush in 2004. Six million less, according to this report from the Gateway Pundit. Patterico's blog numbers the disaffected GOP voters at seven million.

GOP voters wanted a leader, not a maverick.

October 31, 2008

The Informed Voter


Anyone can vote - You should too
Watch the enlightening video I saw at Wizbang blog. From a voter who hopes to be on the buttered side of Barack Obama's Marxist plan to spread the wealth:
I never thought this day would happen. . . .
I won't have to work on puttin' gas in my car.
I won't have to work at payin' my mortgage.
You know.
If I help him (Obama), he's gonna help me.
Ain't democracy grand?
---
Seriously, I think everyone should get out and vote for John McCain. Don't let the biased polls, the fake conservative blog commenters and the liars in the news media put you off. It ain't over until its over.

October 11, 2008

Communist Connections, etc


Your Choice in 2008: Red or Pink
Its starting to become clear that the choice for American voters in the coming presidential election between different flavors of Marxism. Most folks don't even seem to notice; many of them that do don't seem to care. What has changed? We are on the verge of electing a believer in a system that is not only a proven loser, but always involves repression of the liberties enshrined by our Constitution.

As a nation, we fought the communists at home and abroad in the certain knowledge that it is anathema to everything good about America. We have opposed Marxist thought since its inception. Why are we apparently about to elect either a communist, in the form of Barack Obama, or a man who has gone soft on communism, John McCain?

The best answer I have been able to find is in this article by Paul Kengor writing at the American Thinker: Why Obama's Communist Connections Are Not Headlines. You should read it, but in summary it is this: "The history and truth about communism is not taught by our educators."
---
I fear we are lost. We should have been more vigilant.
---
A few odds and ends related to Barack Obama's crapulent friends:
The Gateway Pundit has a Photo Discovered Of Obama With Fellow Chicago Socialist Party Members. Yawn, its the old New Party. Here is the picture:

Barry with New Party commies. Will anyone care?
Here is an informative series of videos about the Weather Underground, the terrorist outfit that Barack Obama's bomb-throwing pals Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn helped to organize. Just more of Barack's unsavory associates. Ho-hum. Its in nine parts.
Weather Underground
Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3
Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6
Part 7 - Part 8 - Part 9
Watch them before Obama's thugs get them pulled from YouTube. Unless, of course, you don't care.

October 04, 2008

Insatiable


More!
I couldn't say it better:
Washington’s pork-stuffed panic mob forked over $700billion/$850billion/$1 trillion-plus of our money over to the Chicken Littles, who handed it over to Foxy Loxy at the Treasury Department.

And now?

And now, they tell us it’s not enough.

Its not enough.

Its not enough.

Its not enough.

Its not enough.

It’s never enough.
Welcome to the slippery slope; next stop, socialism. You get the government you deserve. Suck it up.
---
Now we will never be able to know if the market would have been able to recover on its own or not. Therefore, I shall not be in any hurry to admit that my assessment was wrong.
---
Update: Bitterness over being ignored by our elected representatives on the bailout? Nah! Oh, and BTW, you stink, Lee Terry.
---
Note: October 6, 2008 - Gateway Pundit, an otherwise sensible blog, seems to have cleansed its front page of its slavish, partisan support for the bailout. Now that the bill has passed, he ought to be crowing about it. Someone should ask Jim Hoft how that bailout is working out for him.

June 22, 2008

Lisbon Treaty and the Irish vote

God bless the Irish. The Times of Malta notes that:
[O]f the 27 countries in the European Union only one has to abide by a provision in its Constitution of holding a referendum on matters which may affect its citizens' way of life. This is why the people of Ireland voted recently in a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty - and rejected it.

The other 26 countries, including Malta, opted for ratification by their parliament and basically ignored their people's views on the Lisbon Treaty.
Parliaments and Congresses that think they know what is best for the poor, benighted common folks should be given the boot. Read it and weep, one-worlders. The comments are interesting as well.
---
Note that the one-worlders aren't folding their tents just yet. Quite the opposite. All the elitists are scrambling to undo this democratic result.

May 07, 2008

Dog Starving: not in Nebraska

From Omaha, Nebraska's Kathy Sarantos Niver at Action 3 News comes this story about an Omaha man facing felony charges for leaving his dog outside to starve and freeze to death. Sure, Keion Shelton is a jerk, but should he be made a felon? Here's an excerpt of Kathy's story:
Police say Keion Shelton left town for a week in February and left his dog chained up outdoors to a utility pole. Shelton lived at 7027 North 33rd Street. The dog died.

A spokesperson for the Nebraska Humane Society tells Action 3 News the pitbull died of starvation and hypothermia. He reportedly was unable to reach his food and water, which had frozen, and "was exposed to consistent overnight temperatures below ten degrees, without adequate shelter."

A law passed by the legislature in 2007 makes it a class 4 felony to abandon an animal resulting in serious injury, illness or death. This is the first prosecution in Douglas County based on this new law.
As long as they don't break any other rules, pet owners in Nebraska are free to kill their animals by any means that isn't cruel. Folks usually shoot them with a firearm of sufficient caliber to cause near instant death. Its usually done to end suffering, but the pet being in extremis isn't a requirement. Perhaps the mutt is just useless. You can legally shoot your dog just for the hell of it, if you want. I've had to shoot a few dogs and cats, ones that were sick or injured or had turned bad. Cats are easier. Dogs have a way of looking at you...

For them as are squeamish about dropping the hammer on Rover or Fluffy, or that live in some wussy neighborhood that frowns upon shooting, there is always the Veterinarian. Its all pretty clinical; you don't have to watch if you don't want. The pet needn't be suffering or even sick, the owner makes the decision, not the vet. As with shooting, you can do it to punish the pet or on a whim; motive doesn't count. In the end, Rufus and Fido wind up dead in a barrel like the victims of an internet serial killer. You pay the vet and you are home free. No foul play. No crime.

It isn't done much here, besides with livestock that have been made into 'pets', but Nebraskans may kill and eat their pets if they like. As long as the slaughter isn't cruel, Fido-san can become a delicious meal. Nebraskans of Korean heritage can indulge in their rich home-made dog meat stews without running afoul of the law. (Just so they don't steal the neighbor's dog.)

The Law: is it a ass?
I agree that animal cruelty is wrong. I disagree that it ought to be a crime at all, let alone a felony. This is the kind of offense to the common decency that calls for a home remedy. Where were this shameful Omaha dog-starver's neighbors?

This jerk's neighbors should have taken the dog away from him. In fact, it would have been more humane if one of them had shot it, to end its suffering. If the barbaric butt-head didn't like it, the bigger of his neighbors should have 'straightened him out'. No government involvement required.

Why didn't the neighbors prevent the dog's awful death? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts they were afraid of getting jammed up with the law or sued. Now we will have a local jerk converted into a felon. Where is he going to get a job? I guess there will be a giver-mint program for him.

Revolting development
Since the old feeder believes animals to be private property, the enjoyment of which should be minimally constrained by the law, the concept of Vegetable Rights seems truly far fetched. I saw a link to this Weekly Standard story, The Silent Scream of the Asparagus, at Hot Air. An excerpt:
At the request of the Swiss government, an ethics panel has weighed in on the “dignity” of plants and opined that the arbitrary killing of flora is morally wrong. This is no hoax. The concept of what could be called “plant rights” is being seriously debated.
Read the whole thing (2 pages) if you have the stomach for it. I gagged at the part where a farmer wrongfully "decapitates" some wildflowers. I can see lawyers lining up to be court-appointed guardian ad flora so they can file suits for plant plaintiffs. Green prosecutors will fill the news with chlorophyll drenched murder scenes. Farmers in handcuffs.

As Abe at Don't Let Me Stop You says, "you can't make this stuff up."

I'm sure someone, somewhere is trying to figure out a way to give vegetables the right to vote. They outnumber us. Even if all species of animals could vote, the plants would still have a huge majority. We will all be forced into ethical fruitarianism.
---
In a totally unrelated matter, the old feeder has heard a rumor that CBS evening news anchor Katie Couric is going to be replaced by Charo. Cuchi-cuchi.

January 21, 2008

Live better at your neighbor's expense!


You're Entitled!
Thats right! You are entitled to live better than you do now with no financial outlay on your part. Your neighbors will cover everything, whether they like you and the way you live or not. Why? Because its the law!

Now that over half of all US citizens are on the take its possible to vote as much money for yourself as you want. You have the power to vote for taxes that will make your rich neighbors finance your improved life.

Hillary Clinton has a dream.

December 27, 2007

Benazir Bhutto assassination: Democracy not for everyone


Our hand-basket arrives in Hell
Big news this morning: Benazir Bhutto was assassinated Thursday, shot in the neck and chest at a campaign rally before a homicide bomber blew himself up, killing 20 others. Everyone with a blog is doing an analysis of this bloody development and trying to predict what its effects will be. Will the murder help Giuliani? Will it hurt Ron Paul? Will Fred Thompson stick his foot in his mouth over it? I say these issues are small potatoes.

I think its too early to get into specifics, but the idea of seeing democracy take root among these worthless backward Mohammedan fanatics will be revealed for the Western pipe dream it is. It might be time to take their nuclear toys away from them. Mohammedan fundamentalists don't fit into the modern world, and never will. Human garbage can't operate a democracy.

All I can say for sure is that this doesn't bode well for our efforts to crush the Mohammedan Jihad.
---
Update: In town for a hot bath. Cable TV & internet is included. Flipping the news channels I'm aghast at the facility with which the experts and pundits bandy about absolutely outrageous theories and scenarios that may or should unfold in the aftermath of this Bhutto's murder. Its scary to see how blind or stupid most of them are.

It isn't all that complicated, folks. We must wipe out al Qaeda in Pakistan. Rooting them out of Afghanistan will never be enough. We must destroy every one of al Qaeda's strongholds, starting with the one that harbors bin-Laden and al-Zawahiri, and finishing up with the Jihad Chic nests in Saudi Arabia.

It makes me gag to hear talk of "bringing them to justice"; these murderous madmen and their equally mad followers must be destroyed. After they are gone, we must make sure that Jihad is never taught again, anywhere.

Eternal vigilance is the price of our Liberty. IMHO

November 29, 2007

Just what we need: more 'harmless' rays


Keep your shoes on: T-rays can see right through
From Reuters:
Imagine a trip to the airport without having to slip off your shoes.

A scanner using T-rays, a harmless form of electromagnetic radiation, could make that possible, researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory said on Tuesday.

"At airports we have to take off our shoes," Ulrich Welp of Argonne's Materials Science Division said in a telephone interview. "It is kind of a nuisance."

Using T-rays, it would be possible to examine travelers' shoes without the need to disrobe, he said.
Harmless, eh? When have I heard that before. Why is it that the various manifestations and applications of electromagnetic radiation are always presumed harmless until proved otherwise? This presumption has been around since x-rays were discovered, and arguably since the first human became a suntan freak.

Time has proved that new 'forms' of radiation, like new 'forms' of food additives, pesticides, medicines and such sometimes evidence their danger only years after the exposure. Cancers can take decades to form and be detected. Sometimes the harm is visited on the offspring of the exposed person. When scientists can't consistently tell me whether or not eating eggs will kill me, how can anyone say something is harmless?
Examples of the presumption of harmlessness:
  • My parents, "Get outside and get some sun. Sunshine is good for you boy."
  • The shoe salesman, "Step up and put your feet in the fluoroscope machine sonny, so yer Ma can see how these fit."
  • The doctor, "We'd better take a few x-rays, just to be sure."
  • The dentist, "You are due for a full set of bite wing x-rays."
  • Cell phone kiosk cat, "Thats a rumor, man. Cell phones don't cause cancer."
  • Gun shop salesman, "These tritium sights don't give off harmful radiation."
It all reminds me of hearing, "Asbestos is inert. It won't hurt you. Now get the last of it out of that bag." If I go flying again, I'll remove my shoes. Its no trouble, and my feet don't smell that bad.
---
I'll have a slice without so much rat radiation in it. Check the Feed Trough for video.
---
Aren't you glad you didn't waste your time watching the faked-up, rat-filled, dishonest CNN/YouTube debate?

November 06, 2007

The solution to Pakistan election troubles

Let the Conservative Cat explain why it is time for the US to deploy our secret weapon in Pakistan.

October 18, 2007

Vote your mind, if you have one


Zippy has half a mind to vote in 2008
Headline: CNN Poll: Nearly half think U.S. in recession.

Thanks to the hand-wringing of biased anti-capitalists in the Main Stream Media, nearly half of Americans believe something that is patently and demonstrably untrue. No, its not just global warming they are wrong about, but the state of the US economy.

Economic status is easily measured, and by any reasonable statistical analysis the US economy has never been in better shape. The facts are clear, but the sad sacks of the left refuse to admit the successes of our capitalist system as surely as they are blind to our successes in the Jihad wars. I can't recall a time when all the economic indicators were as good as they are today. To say that America is in a recession is to say you believe a lie or are too ignorant to know better.

This story supports the case against universal suffrage. Why should people who don't know squat about something so important as the state of our national economy be allowed to participate in national elections? Do you really want the likes of Zippy at the wheel?
---
Pinhead voters might just elect a mendacious communist thug as President. Watch the movie.

July 31, 2007

Too Stupid to Vote: Vegansexuals


I'll just have the salad.
Some cats are just too stupid to vote. By their words and actions, they reveal a lack of learning, a flawed reasoning ability or both. Vegansexuals are such people. From New Zealand:
Vegansexuals are people who do not eat any meat or animal products, and who choose not to be sexually intimate with non-vegan partners whose bodies, they say, are made up of dead animals.
---
Many female respondents described being attracted to people who ate meat, but said they did not want to have sex with meat-eaters because their bodies were made up of animal carcasses.
In the hippy-dippy 60's, vegetarian chicks were cheap dates. Restaurants in Iowa college towns didn't have any fancy, expensive salads, and all spaghetti sauce had meat in it back then. They ordered the dinner salad. Less than $2. Sadly, these same chicks always wanted to see some hideous foreign angst movie with English subtitles as part of the date.

July 24, 2007

Another reason democracy stinks


He's got a scheme
People like this get to vote. India has certainly improved since they adopted democracy and let these fine witch hunters have a say in governance. Universal suffrage is stupid. Why would anyone want idiots making important decisions? It spells the end of any republic.

Its time we admitted that full democracy is just another form of tyranny. The only difference is that in an unrestricted democracy, the tyrant will be the lowest common denominator.

May 07, 2007

French Democracy


French celebrate their love of Democracy
Like everything else in France, their elections are a real riot! LGF has the latest burning car count, something you might not see at the top of the page in your favorite source of Main Stream News. Like this al-Reuters story where you can find their count, 730 French cars burned, below the fold.

Vince aut Morire warns us that Sarkozy is only relatively conservative. Relative to a French liberal, I suppose he is conservative. As Vinnie says: "Thousands of burning Peugeots can’t be wrong."